Going Swedish

I can’t recall how many times I’ve seen David Beckham in underwear, but I do know that every time it happens it will make news everywhere. This time, Beckham is going all Swedish by posing in his skimpies for H&M. Overrated or not, he’s still one of the hottest footballers ever lived. Since there’s no point of yapping further, I’ll let you analyze what is there to be analyzed (hint: it is horizontal)  while I quickly make my way to the deeper end because this blog just got a little shallow.

David Beckham H&M Underwear Ad

David Beckham H&M Underwear Ad

David Beckham H&M Underwear Ad

David Beckham H&M Underwear Ad

David Beckham H&M Underwear Ad

David Beckham H&M Underwear Ad

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Juicy Comments

20 Responses to “Going Swedish”
Register to comment easier or log in if you are already a member. Learn how to setup your own avatar here.

  1. Joe on January 4th, 2012 at 4:53 pm

    the tattoos ruin any sort of sexiness, just like with Adam Levine

  2. Fredo on January 4th, 2012 at 5:10 pm

    His tattoos are beautiful, as well as his other attributes.

  3. martin on January 4th, 2012 at 5:25 pm

    Hello

    I love your blog.
    You should add it in the new gay bloggers’ platform.
    http://www.bestgaybloggers.com

    What I like is that you can meet other gay bloggers with similar interests,
    and get many tools and tips for having more impact to your blog.
    I just add my blog.
    That ‘s why I give you the tip.
    ;)

    Martin

  4. Jack on January 4th, 2012 at 6:40 pm

    While I’m not a big fan of his tattoos, he’s such a freaking sexy man that I can pretty much overlook them. Thank you for bringing this set of pictures to us!!

  5. len on January 5th, 2012 at 5:23 am

    I agree with Joe.

  6. Mark on January 5th, 2012 at 7:27 am

    More agreement with Joe.

    (And yes, Adam Levine was so fucking hot before he fell into a vat of ink. Now, I only like him clothed. Which is just backwards.)

  7. Rupertbare on January 5th, 2012 at 9:25 am

    What is so sexy????????? A middle aged, over-inked guy with a sock(or 2) down his shorts!!!!!!!!!!!

  8. Fredo on January 5th, 2012 at 9:34 am

    @Rupertbare – what does his age have to do with it? What is the official age cut-off for being sexy?

    That aside, I pretty much expected this sort of feedback on Becks, as it seems as trendy for certain folks to hate on tattoos as it is for people to get them. No worries, though. Diff’rent strokes. Pass on him if you will. More strokes for me.

    ^_^

  9. szoszo on January 5th, 2012 at 2:25 pm

    i think db is so overrated… i spent a few years being an avid football fan – obviously i was simply oggling guys – and i gotta admit hes one of the least developed players muscle wise and i dont find anything outstanding about his face either, while i know we dont like them for their brains hes also one of the most retarded… love his tats tho.

  10. Graham Anderson on January 6th, 2012 at 4:05 am

    I can’t believe some of the queens here and on Towleroad: “middle aged”? He’s 36 and still an accomplished athlete.

  11. Rupertbare on January 6th, 2012 at 6:53 am

    @Graham Anderson 36+36=72, so even if one doesn’t consider a brain dead athlete middle-aged, tell me why the photo shopped pix?????? I mean who are they trying to kid, with his belly……….David or Victoria(another talentless waste of space!!!!)

  12. Fredo on January 6th, 2012 at 10:28 am

    @Rupertbare You really need to get over yourself.

  13. Phil on January 7th, 2012 at 12:55 am

    Fredo you asked what the cut off age for being sexy is…That would depend on which model you use…For instance if you use the Madison Avenue model, which panders to the 15-35 age group(anybody over 35 falls into the ‘all others’ category)-then 35 is the cut off age…

    If you use the Gay model then the cut off age is 30…After 30 you have to add 7 years to your ‘human’ age to come up with your ‘gay’ age…I’m 54 in human years-which makes me(let’s see add 7 years for every year over 30-)198 in gay years…

    And as to the ink comments-while I don’t want to have any ink myself, I do kind of like the ‘badboy’ image some ink indicates; but that’s just me…I also wonder how much of DB’s ink is real-I seem to remember in another underware add his arms had a tribal on them and not much else(maybe some kind of Oriental symbols)…

  14. Rupertbare on January 7th, 2012 at 3:16 am

    @Fredo………..I am definitely “over” myself……….shame the tubby overrated footballer isn’t!!!!!!!!! Why else show yourself in your skivvies???? As for that, can anyone remember the last goal he kicked???????

  15. lankyguy on January 13th, 2012 at 3:18 pm

    Love him, love the ink. Let the haters hate, more for the rest of us.

  16. Waverider on January 27th, 2012 at 11:55 pm

    Well, haters…fact-of-the-matter is, Becks, Inc. is still a cash-cow. He’s a sports icon and celebrity in his own right and corporate sponsors have been pushing his image for years because he can sell a product. Apparently he still has market appeal….no matter how un-sexy a few of you may think he is. Scream all you want, but that guy is laughing all the way to the bank for as long as his image will allow.

  17. David Beckham H&M Underwear Commercial - Squarehippies.com on February 1st, 2012 at 3:48 am

    [...] but the much anticipated crotch shot. Fine, only reason I need to see his bulge is to confirm these. I guess I’ll have to say extra prayers to the H&M Photoshop gods when I go to bed [...]

  18. Taking Manwhoring to A New Height - Squarehippies.com on August 16th, 2012 at 2:56 am

    [...] you think this is the best thing that’s ever happened in your life, you’re in for a real treat. When [...]

  19. David Beckham Shirtless for H&M - Squarehippies.com on August 17th, 2012 at 3:24 am

    [...] yesterday. I don’t know – they don’t really do much down there, look pretty much the same as the ones we saw earlier. Standard Photoshop job. Having said that, I’m digging the thick [...]

  20. lena jones on November 28th, 2012 at 2:59 am

    Just got a little shallow? Really? No!

Leave a Reply




Back to Top